ارزیابی نقش طراحی معماری در ایجاد رفتارهای پایدار در کاربری مسکونی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شیراز

چکیده

طراحی در جهت ایجاد رفتارهای پایدار، حوزه جدید پژوهشی است که به کاهش پیامدهای اجتماعی و محیط‌‌زیستی ساختمان‌‌ها در جریان بهره‌‌برداری از آن‌‌ها، از طریق تغییر عادت‌های کاربران و وادار کردن آن‌‌ها به بهبود رفتارهای خود به طرق مختلف می‌‌پردازد. بخش زیادی از این پیامدها، مرتبط با مصرف انرژی در ساختمان‌‌ها است. در میان تئوری‌‌های مطرح‌‌ شده در این حوزه، به نظر می‌‌رسد به بسترهای فرهنگی مختلف و محدودیت‌‌هایی که طراحی در شکل ‌‌دادن به رفتار در جهت کاهش مصرف انرژی دارد، کمتر توجه شده است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارزیابی چگونگی تاثیرگذاری طراحی معماری بر رفتار، برای کاهش مصرف انرژی است. بر این اساس، این فرضیه مطرح شد که طراحی معماری می‌‌تواند از طریق غلبه بر فرهنگ مصرفی نامناسب و تغییر شکل رفتار، در جهت کاهش مصرف انرژی و تحقق رفتار پایدار گام بردارد. در این مطالعه ترکیبی (کمی، کیفی) از نوع همبستگی، طرح مدل‌‌یابی معادله‌های ساختاری، از تحقیق پیمایشی استفاده شد. جامعه آماری، ساکنان شهر شیراز در بهمن‌‌ماه 1395 و حجم نمونه، به کمک فرمول کوکران، 385 نفر (به‌‌منظور اطمینان بیشتر 400 نفر)، به روش غیراحتمالی ترکیبی انتخاب شد. پس از تایید روایی صوری، محتوایی، سازه و پایایی پرسشنامه محقق ‌‌ساخته، همبستگی متغیرها و فرضیه‌‌ها با نرم‌‌افزارهای آماری SPSS16 و AMOS22 ارزیابی و اثبات شد. یافته‌‌ها بیانگر تاثیرگذاری فرهنگ، معماری و رفتار بر میزان مصرف انرژی است. در نهایت، ضمن معرفی فرهنگ به‌‌عنوان یکی از موانعی که طراحی، در شکل ‌‌دادن به رفتار برای کاهش مصرف انرژی دارد، بر ضرورت اصلاح محیط به‌‌گونه‌‌ای که افراد را به سمت‌‌و‌‌سوی موردنظر هدایت کند، تاکید شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Role of Architectural Design in Creating Sustainable Behaviors in Residential Buildings

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hadi Keshmiri
  • Marzieh Gholampour
Islamic Azad University of Shiraz
چکیده [English]

Design for Sustainable Behaviors is a new field of research that aims to reduce the social and environmental consequences of buildings in their life cycles, through changing users’ habits and forcing them to improve their behaviors in different ways. A large part of these consequences is related to energy consumption in buildings. Among the proposed theories in this area, it seems that less attention has been paid to different cultural contexts and the barriers of design methods in shaping behavior to reduce energy consumption. The purpose of this study is to investigate how architectural design affects behavior to reduce energy consumption. Accordingly, it was hypothesized that architectural design can reduce energy consumption and realize sustainable behavior through overcoming inappropriate utilization culture and behavior transforming. A survey was conducted in this mixed-method (quantitative and qualitative), Correlation type, and Structural equation modeling study. Shiraz residents in February 2017 were determined as the statistical population. 385 people were determined as the sample size based on the Cochran formula, and by the Non-Probability sampling method. The correlation of variables was assessed, and the hypotheses were proved using statistical software SPSS16 and AMOS22, after confirmation of Face validity, content validity, construct validity and reliability of the researcher-made questionnaire. The results prove the impact of culture, architecture, and behavior on energy consumption. Finally, in addition to introducing culture as a barrier to designing in shaping behavior to reduce energy consumption, the necessity of environmental modification in a way that leads users toward the desired direction, was emphasized.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable behaviors
  • Architectural design
  • Utilization culture
  • Energy consumption
  • Residential buildings
Abele, E.; Anderl, R. & Birkhofer, H. 2005. Environmentally-friendly product development - methods and tools. London: Springer-Verlag.
Bamberg, S. 2013. Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34: 151-159.
Bhamra, T.; Lilley, D. & Tang, T. 2011. Design for Sustainable Behavior: Using Products to Change Consumer Behavior. The Design Journal, 14 (4): 427-445.
Brezet, H. & Van Hemel, C. 1997. Eco-design: A Promising Approach to Sustainable Production and Consumption. Paris: UNEP.
Broady, M. 1996. Social Theory in Architectural Design. In R. Gutman, ed. 2009. People and Buildings. New York: Transaction Publishers. Ch.11.
Chick, A. & Micklethwaite, P. 2011. Design for Sustainable Change: How design and designers can drive the sustainability agenda. Worthing: AVA Publishing.
Clune, S. 2010. Design and Behavioral Change. The Journal of Design Strategies, 4 (1): 68-75.
Hajizadeh Meimandi, M. & Yusefi, F. 2013. A Study of several social factors related to consumer Culture among Women in Yazd. Women's Strategic Studies, 16(61): 233-271 (In Persian).
Harland, P.; Staats, H. & Wilke, H. A. 2007. Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29 (4): 323-334.
Hooman H.A. 2014. Structural equation modeling with Lisrel application. Tehran: Samt (In Persian).
IEA & UNDP. 2013. Modernising Building Energy Codes: to Secure our Global Energy Future. Paris: International Energy Agency.
Jenks, M. & Dempsey, N. eds. 2005. Future Forms and Design for Sustainable Cities. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Kalantari, Kh. 2006. Data processing and analysis in socio-economic research. Tehran: Sharif (In Persian).
Kline, P. 1994. An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Psychology Press.
Kohler, W. 1970. Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modem psychology. New York: Liverlight.
Kolbert, E. 2008. Dymaxion Man: The visions of Buckminster Fuller. [online] The New Yorker. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/06/09/dymaxion-man [Accessed 5 August. 2016].
Lawshe, C. H. 1975. A Quantitative approach to content validity. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 28: 563-575.
Lee, S-A. 2007. Environmental Psychology Research in Practice: Thoughts on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design. In: E. Edgerton, O. Romice & C. Spencer, eds. 2007. Environmental Psychology: Putting Research into Practice. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.12-29.
Lester Clarke, J. 2013. Sustainable buildings: sustainable behavior. Ph. D. Kingston University.
Lewin, K. 1940. Formalization and progress in psychology. In D. Cartwright, ed. 1951. Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper. Ch.1.
Lockton, D.; Harrison, D. & Stanton, N.A. 2010. The Design with Intent Method: A design tool for influencing user behavior. Applied Ergonomics, 41 (3): 382-392.
MacCallum, R. C.; Browne, M. W. & Sugawara, H. M. 1996. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1 (2): 130-149.
McKenzie-Mohr, D. & Smith, W. 1999. Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
Schumacker, R.E. & Lomax, R.G. 2004. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. London: Taylor & Francis.
Schwartz, S. H. 1977. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10: 221-279.
Spangenberg, J. H.; Fuad-Luke, A. & Blincoe, K. 2010. Design for Sustainability (DfS): the interface of sustainable production and consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18: 1485-1493,
Steg, L & Gifford, R. 2008. Social psychology and environmental problems. In L. Steg, A. P. Buunk & T. Rothengatter, eds. 2008. Applied Social Psychology: Understanding and Managing Social Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.184-205.
Stern, P. C. 1997. Toward a working definition of consumption for environmental research and policy. In P. C. Stem, T. Dietz, V. R. Ruttan, RH. Socolow & J. L. Sweeney, eds. 1997. Environmentally significant consumption: Research Directions. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp.12-35.
Stevels, A. & Griese, H. 2004. Electronics goes green: Current and future issues. In: H. Reichl, H. Griese & H. Potter, eds. 2004. Electronics goes green: driving forces for future electronics. Berlin: IEEE, pp.45-54.
Tang, T. & Bhamra, T. A. 2008. Changing energy consumption behavior through sustainable product design, 10th International design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 19 – 22, 2008.
Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Van Dam, S.S.; Bakker, C. A. & Van Hal, J. D. M. 2010. Home energy monitors: impact over the medium term. Building Research & Information, 38 (5): 458-469.
Walker, J. A. 1989. Design History and the History of Design. London: Pluto.
WCED. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wever, R.; Van Kuijk, J. & Boks, C. 2008. User-centered Design for Sustainable Behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(1): 9-20.
Wilson, G. T.; Bhamra, T. A. & Lilley, D. 2010. Reducing domestic energy consumption: a user-centered design approach, Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation: 14th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ERSCP) conference and the 6th Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities (EMSU) conference, Delft, The Netherlands, October 25-29, 2010, pp.200-222.
Winter, D. & Koger, S. 2004. The psychology of environmental problems. 2nd ed. California: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.