کاربرد روش انتقال منافع در ارزشگذاری منابع آبی؛ مطالعه موردی ساحل سیترا شهرستان نوشهر

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار دانشگاه سید جمال الدین اسد آبادی

چکیده

کاربرد روش انتقال منافع در ارزشگذاری منابع آبی
(مطالعه موردی: ساحل سیترا شهرستان نوشهر)
 
*احمد سام دلیری
 
* استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه سید جمال‌الدین اسدآبادی، ایران
 
(تاریخ دریافت: 16/12/1395؛ تاریخ تصویب: 09/07/1397)
 
 
چکیده
ارزشگذاری خدمات اکوسیستم‌های طبیعی نقش مهمی در برنامه‌ریزی برای حفاظت و مدیریت مبتنی بر اکوسیستم دارد. در این پژوهش روش انتقال منافع به عنوان یکی از روش‌های ارزشگذاری مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. این روش نتایج مطالعه‌های ارزشگذاری قبلی را در زمینه موارد جدید سیاستگذاری یا تصمیم‌گیری به‌کار می‌برد. برای سیاستگذاران و مدیران در بخش منابع‌طبیعی و محیط‌زیست، ارزشگذاری‌های تجربی اصلی منابع اغلب در دسترس نیست. از این رو استفاده از روش انتقال منافع جایگزینی رایج برای مطالعه‌های ارزشگذاری اصلی است. بر این اساس و به منظور استفاده کاربردی از این روش با استفاده از مطالعه قبلی ارزش تفرجی سالانه ساحل رادیو دریا در شهرستان چالوس و انتقال آن به ساحل سیترا در شهرستان نوشهر، با توجه به مبانی روش انتقال منافع و استفاده از مدل انتقال تابع منافع، مجموع ارزش تفرجی سالانه ساحل سیترا برابر 638 میلیون ریال برای سال 1393 محاسبه شده است. همچنین نتایج نشان می‌دهد که 65 درصد افراد بررسی شده در این مطالعه حاضر به پرداخت مبلغی برای استفاده تفریحی از ساحل موردنظر هستند و متوسط تمایل به پرداخت بازدیدکنندگان برای ارزش تفریحی این ساحل 5/1426 ریال برای هر بازدید است.
 
 
 
 
 
 
کلید واژه‌ها: انتقال منافع، ارزش تفرجی، نوشهر، ساحل سیترا، ساحل رادیو- دریا
 
 
 
 
 
 

* نویسنده مسئول:                                                                                                 Email: samdeliri@yahoo.com

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Application Benefit Transfer for the Valuation of Water Resources: case of sitra beach in nooshahr city

نویسنده [English]

  • ahmad samdeliri
Assistant Professor of agricultural economics, Sayyed jamaleddin Asadabadi University
چکیده [English]

Application Benefit Transfer for the Valuation of Water
Resources: Case of Sitra Beach in Nooshahr City
 
 
 
 
*Samdeliri, A.
 
*Assist. Profe. of Agricultural Economics,
Sayyed Jamaleddin Asadabadi University, Iran
 
(Received: 20176/03/06; Accepted: 2018/10/02)
 
 
 
Abstract
The valuation of ecosystem services can play an important role in conservation planning and ecosystem-based management. Benefit transfer is the valuing methodology focused by this paper. This technique applies the results of previous environmental valuation studies to new policy or decision-making contexts. For policy makers, regulators and natural resource managers, the resources necessary for original empirical resource valuations are often unavailable. A common alternative to original valuation studies is the practice of benefit transfer. Also in this study we has been used a function transfer method and transfer a recreational value from radio-darya beach (as a study site) to sitra beach (as a policy site). In the framework, total annual recreational value of sitra beach is estimated to be about 638 million Rials in 2014. The results show that 65 percent of investigated individuals will to pay for recreational usage of mentioned coast. The average of WTP is 1426.5 Rial for each visit.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
JEL classification: Q25, Q51
Keywords: Benefit Transfer, Recreational value, Nooshahr city, Sitra beach, Radio-darya beach
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

*Corresponding Author                                                                              Email: samdeliri@yahoo.com

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Benefit Transfer
  • Recreational value
  • nooshahr city
  • sitra beach
  • radio-darya beach

Andreopoulos, D. & Damigos, D. 2017. To transfer or not to transfer? Evidence from validity and reliability tests for international transfers of non-market adaptation benefits in river basins. Journal of Environmental Management.185: 44-53.

Anielski, M. & Wilson, S. 2005. Counting Canada´s Natural Capital: Assessing the Real Value of Canada´s Boreal Ecosystems. The Pembina Institute.

Bergstrom, J.C. & De Civita, P. 1999. Status of benefit transfer in the United States and Canada: A review.Can. J. Agric. Econ. 47, 79–87

Brenner, J.; Jiménez, J.A.; Sardá, R. & Garola, A. 2010. An Assessment of the Non-market Value of the Ecosystem Services Provided by the Catalan Coastal Zone, Spain. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53: 27-38

Brookshire, D.S. & Neill, H.R. 1992. Benefit transfers: Conceptual and ethical issues. Water Resour. Res., 28, 651–655.

Brouwer, R. & etall.2009. Economic Valuation of Environmental and Resource Costs and Benefits in the Water Framework Directive: Technical Guidelines for Practitioners. EU funded project AquaMoney, 1-240.

Brouwer, R.; Bliem, M.; Getzner, M.; Szerényi, S. & Vadineanu, A. 2016. Valuation and transferability of the non-market benefits of river restoration in the Danube river basin using a choice experiment. Ecological Engineering. 87: 20 29.

Brouwer, R .2000. Environmental value transfer: State of the art and future prospects. Ecol. Econ., 32, 137–152.

Columbo, S. & Hanley, N .2008. How can we reduce the errors from benefits transfer? An investigation using the choice experiment method. Land Econ. 84, 128–147.

Constanza, R.; Arge, R.; de Groot, S.; Farber, M.; Grasso, B.; Hannon, K.; Limburg, S.; Naeem, R.; O‘Neill, J.; Paruelo, R.; Raskin, P. & van den Belt, M. 1997. The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature. 387: 253-260.

Czajkowski, M.; Ahtiainen, H.; Artell, J. & Meyerhoff, J. 2017. Choosing a Functional Form for an International Benefit Transfer: Evidence from a Nine-country Valuation Experiment. Ecological Economics.134: 104-113.

Desvousges, W.H.; Johnson, F.R. & Banzhaf, H.S. 1998. Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information: Principles and Application of the Transfer Method; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.

Farzanegan, M. 2002. Iran's position in the Caspian Sea energy resources. Thesis in MA degree of economics. Faculty of Economics, Tehran University. (In Persian)

Figueroa, E. & Pasten, R. 2009. Country-specific Environmental Kuznets Curves: a Random Coefficient Approach Applied to High-income Countries. Estudios de Economia, 36: 5-32.

Figueroa, E. & Pasten, R. 2010. A Characterization of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: The Role of the Elasticity of Substitution. Universidad de Talca. Working Paper.

Hayati, B. & khadem Baladi pour, T. 2012. An Estimation of the Recreational Value and Determination of Effective Factors on Visitors Willingness to Pay for Ghourigol Wetland. Agriculthral Economics & Development. 26: 22-30. (In Persian)

Ibarraran, M. E. & Rodriguez, M. 2007. Estudio Sobre Economía del Cambio Climático en Mexico. INE/ADE-008/2007.

Krupnick, N.; Harrison, K.; Nickell, E. & Toman, M. 1995. The Value of Health Benefits from Ambient Air Quality Improvements in Central and Eastern Europe: An Exercise in Benefits Transfer. Resources for the Future.

Lahijani, H. 2002. Lessons offered at the Caspian Workshop. First volume. Institute for Oceanography and Atmospheric Science. (In Persian)

Lehr, U. 2005. Bayesian Benefit Transfer in Environmental Valuation. Department of Economics. University of Hohenheim, Germany.

López, M.T.; Zuk, M.; Garibay, V.; Tzintzun, G.; Iniestra, R. & Fernández, A. 2005. Health Impacts from Power Plant Emissions in Mexico. Atmospheric Environment. 39: 1199-1209.

Macías, P., & Islas, J. 2010. Damage Costs Produced by Electric Power Plants: An Externality Valuation in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Science of the Total Environment, 408: 4511-23

McKinley, G.; Zuk, M.; Hojer, M.; Avalos, M.; Gonzalez, I.; Iniestra, R.; Laguna, I.; Martinez, M.; Osnaya, P.; Reynales, L.; Valdes, R. & Martinez, J .2005. Quantification of Local and Global Benefits from Air Pollution Control in Mexico City, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39–61.

Manafi Mollayousefi, M. & Hayati, B. 2010. Estimating the Outdoor Recreation Value of Maharloo Lake of Shiraz with the Use of Contingent Valuation Method. Journal of Natural Environment, 63: 291-302. (In Persian)

Niemi, E. & Lee, K. 2002. Economic Benefits of Protecting Natural Resources in the Sonoran Desert. Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection, 49 pp.

Navrud, S. & Ready, R. 2007. Review of methods for value transfer. In Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods; Navrud, S., Ready, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp: 1–10.

Ortega. M. J.; Brouwer, R.; Ojea, E. & Berbel, J. 2012. Benefit transfer and spatial heterogeneity of preferences for water quality improvements. Journal of Environmental Management.106: 22-29.

Rosenberger, R.S. & Loomis, J.B. 2001. Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Use Values: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan. No. RMRS-GTR-72; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA.

Rosenberger, R. S. & Johnston, R. J. 2009. Selection effects in meta-analysis and benefit transfer: Avoiding unintended consequences. Land Economics, 85, 410–428.

Sahabi, B.; Hajian. M. & Javaheri, B. 2011. Assessment of Factors Affecting on the Visitors' WTP and Evaluating Recreational Importance of Jajroud Area.Economical Modeling. 6: 111-126. (In Persian)

Sharzehi, G. & Samdeliri, A. 2012. Estimating the Recreational Value of the Caspian Sea Coast (Case Study: Radio-darya Recreational Coast of Chalous, Iran). ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES. 9 (3): 1-14. (In Persian)

Statistical Center of Iran. A Report on Consumer price index for Goods and Services of Households. (Years of: 2012, 2013 & 2014). (In Persian)

Statistical Center of Iran .2013. Statistical yearbook of Mazandaran province. Publications of Statistical Center of Iran. (In Persian)

Young, R.A. 2005. Determining the Economic Value of Water; Concepts and Methods. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.