پژوهش های محیط زیست

پژوهش های محیط زیست

اولویت‌بندی و مدل‌سازی ساختاری- تفسیری ضوابط ملی آمایش ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه علوم و مهندسی محیط‌زیست، دانشکده شیلات و محیط‌زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع‌طبیعی گرگان، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه علوم و مهندسی محیط‌زیست، دانشکده منابع‌طبیعی و محیط‌زیست، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران .
3 دکتری علوم و مهندسی محیط‌زیست، دانشکده شیلات و محیط‌زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع‌طبیعی گرگان، ایران,
4 دکتری علوم و مهندسی محیط‌زیست، دانشکده شیلات و محیط‌زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع‌طبیعی گرگان، ایران
10.22034/eiap.2025.246792
چکیده
با گذشت بیش از نیم قرن از آغاز دوره‌های مختلف مطالعات و اجرای طرح‌های آمایشی در ایران، این فرایند همچنان از کاستی‌ها و ناکامی‌هایی رنج می‌برد. از دلایل اصلی برخی ناکامی‌ها در طرح‌‌های آمایشی ایران می‌‌توان به شرح خدمات مفصل، اهداف و ضوابط برگرفته از مکاتب گوناگون و پراکنده و نیز فقدان توجه به اولویت‌‌ ضوابط مختلف آمایشی اشاره نمود. هدف از این مقاله بررسی موانع و مشکلات طرح‌های پژوهشی آمایشی و راه‌های کاهش برخی از این مشکلات با ارایه مدل اولویت‌‌بندی ضوابط آمایشی کشور است. در این پژوهش، ضوابط سه‌گانه‌ آمایشی کشور بر مبنای شباهت حداکثری و با استفاده از متغیرهای اسمی، اولویت‌‌بندی زمانی و موضوع عملکرد، به 18 دسته کلی تقسیم‌‌بندی شدند. سپس، بر پایه نظرسنجی از نخبگان و با استفاده از مدل ساختاری- تفسیری، ضوابط آمایشی ایران سطح‌‌بندی شدند. نتایج پژوهش حاضر حاکی از آن است که این ضوابط را می‌‌توان در 5 سطح جای داد. سطح اول که مهمترین ضوابط آمایشی سرزمین هستند و در طرح‌‌های آمایشی باید در اولویت قرار گیرند شامل ضوابط توسعه‌‌ای در ابعاد مختلف صنعتی و معدن‌‌کاوی، شبکه‌‌های ارتباطی، طرح‌‌‌‌های آبخیزداری و بیابان‌‌زدایی، توسعه و آمایش دانشگاه‌‌ها و قطب‌‌های علمی و در نهایت توجه به توان سرزمین در اشکال مختلف توسعه است. بر این اساس، سازمان‌ها می‌‌توانند براساس اولویت اجرای ضوابط آمایش ملی از نتایج پژوهش حاضر یا روش به‌کار رفته در آن استفاده نمایند و جهت افزایش عملکرد طرح‌‌های آمایشی بر متغیرهای پیش‌‌برنده قوی که در مدل ساختاری- تفسیری استخراج شده‌‌اند، تمرکز نمایند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Prioritization and Interpretive Structural Modeling of Iran's National Land- Use Planning Criteria

نویسندگان English

Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny 1
Iman Saeedi 2
Zohreh Akhgarisangatash 3
Seyed Ali Taghizadeh Diva 4
1 Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran.
3 Ph.D in Environmental Science and Engineering, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran.
4 Ph.D. in Environmental Science and Engineering, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran
چکیده English

More than half a century after the initiation of various phases of spatial planning studies and implementation projects in Iran, this process continues to suffer from deficiencies and shortcomings. Among the main reasons for the limited success of some spatial planning projects in Iran are the extensive terms of reference, diversity and conflict in schools of thought used to derive objectives and regulations, as well as insufficient attention to the prioritization of different spatial planning criteria. The purpose of this article is to examine the obstacles and challenges facing spatial planning research projects and to propose ways to mitigate some of these problems through a model for prioritizing national spatial planning criteria. In this study; using nominal variables, temporal prioritization, and functional themes; the country's three categories of spatial planning criteria were classified into 18 general groups based on maximum similarity. Subsequently, based on expert surveys and through the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach, Iran’s spatial planning criteria were stratified into different levels. The findings indicate that these criteria can be organized into five hierarchical levels. The first level, representing the most important spatial planning criteria that should receive priority in planning projects, includes development-oriented criteria related to various dimensions of industrial development and mining, transportation and communication networks, watershed management and desertification control projects, the development and spatial organization of universities and scientific hubs, and, ultimately, consideration of land capability in different forms of development. Accordingly, organizations can utilize either the results of this study or the methodology employed in it to prioritize the implementation of national spatial planning criteria. To enhance the effectiveness of spatial planning projects, they should focus on the key driving variables identified through the Interpretive Structural Modeling framework.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Interpretive Structural Modeling
National land use planning
Iran
Prioritization
Regulations
Atashsooz, A., Feizi, K., Kazazi, A., & Olfat, L. (2016). Interpretive structural modeling of petrochemical industry supply chain risks. Industrial Management Studies, 14(41), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.22054/ jims.2016.4168 (in Persian)
Azar, A. (2013). Soft operations research. Tehran, Iran: Industrial Management Organization Publishing. (in Persian)
Elfath, L., & Shahriari Nia, A. (2015). Interpretive structural modeling of factors affecting partner selection in agile supply chain. Production & Operations Management, 5(2), 109–128. Retrieved from https:// www.sid.ir/paper/?(in Persian)
Faisal, M.N., Banwet, D.K., Shankar, R. (2006). Supply Chain Risk Mitigation: Modeling the Enablers. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 535-552.
Firoozjaian, A. A., Firoozjaian, M., Hashemi Patoroudi, H., & Gholamrezazadeh, F. (2013). Application of ISM in tourism studies: An analytical perspective. Tourism Planning and Development Journal, 2(6), 129–159. Retrieved from https://www.sid.ir/paper/? (in Persian)
Ghanbari, V., & Safaei Shakib, A. (2017). Structuring quality management issues with interpretive structural modeling approach. Journal of Standard and Quality Management, 7(1), 6– 15. Retrieved from https:// www.magiran.com/search? (in Persian)
Hamzehlouei, S., Ahmadian, R., & Shami, M. R. (2016). Location allocation of industrial towns using genetic algorithm in a GIS environment: Case study of the coastal regions of Mazandaran. Marine Transport Industry, 2(4), 42–50. (in Persian)
Hatami‑ Nejad, H., & Amu, O. (2019). A pathology and evaluation of spatial planning schemes in Iran. Regional Planning Quarterly, 9(34), 27–38. Retrieved from https://www.sid.ir/paper/… (in Persian)
Hedayati Aghmashhadi, A., Jafari, H. R., Mehrdadi, N., Fahimi, H., Farshchi, P., & Zahedi, S. (2015). Land use planning and water resources management: Resource planning instead of activity planning (Case study: Caspian basin). Environmental Science & Technology Journal, 17(3), 65–85. Retrieved from https://www.sid.ir/paper/86964/fa (in Persian)
Jafarian, B., Sarvar, R., & Borna, R. (2018). Modeling barriers to the feasibility of spatial planning projects in Tehran Province with a futures studies approach. Geography (Scientific‑Research Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Society), 16(59), 77–94. (in Persian)
Jain, V. K., Kumar, P., Dube, P., Rawat, P. (2020). Decision-Making Framework Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (Ism) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Methods: Millennials & Sustainable Consumption. Engineering & Management.
Jharkharia, S. & Shankar, R. (2005). IT- Enablement of supply chains: Understanding the barriers, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(1), 11-27
Karkehabadi, Z., Qaderi, M. R., Akbari, M., & Bagheri, H. (2018). Investigating provincial development in the framework of spatial planning. New Perspectives in Human Geography Quarterly, 11(1), 101–110. Retrieved from https://www.magiran.com/paper/1944607 (in Persian)
Khosh‑Amooz, G., Talai, M., & Mansourian, A. 2012. Development of a spatial multi‑objective decision model with emphasis on planning energy‑intensive industries. Journal of Environmental Studies, 38(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22059/jes.2012.29095 (in Persian)
Li, S., Chai, J., Wang, M., Zhang, L. & Tian, X. (2020). Exploring Critical Factors Influencing Green Development of the Power Grid Based on DEMATEL-ISM Model. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 555 (2020) 012023 IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/555/1/012023
Momeni, M., Mobaraki, O., & Jenani, N. (2013). Spatial planning and management of spatial development: A case study of Malekan County. Urban Management Studies, 5(13), 45–56. https://sid.ir/paper/ 199191/en (in Persian)
Natalia, C., Oktavia, C. W., Tjhong, S. G., Hidayat, TP. (2020). Integrated Ism_ Anp Method for Supplier Selection Criteria Analysis: A Case Study of Construction Company. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 847 (2020) 012053 IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/847/1/012053
Parehizkar, R., & Fazli, S. (2016). Interpretive structural modeling of factors affecting environmental impact assessment of green product development: A case study of green product design selection in the hygienic products industry of Qazvin Province. Research in Decision Making, 1(4), 25–44. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/doc/1853735 (in Persian)
Prasad, U.C. & Suri, R.K. (2011). Modeling of continuity and change forces in private higher technical education using total interpretive structural modeling (TISM), Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 12(3), pp. 31–39.
Saeedi et al. (2022). Green Infrastructure Development in Urban Areas for Runoff Control (Case Study: District 5, Tehran). Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.
Salehi, A., & Pour Asghar Sanga‑chin, F. (2009). An analysis of barriers to land use planning in Iran. Rahbord Scientific Journal, 17(52), 149–181. Retrieved from https://rahbord.csr.ir/article_124351. html (in Persian)
Salmanmahiny, A. (2012). Foundations of environmental protection (2nd ed.). Tehran, Iran: Di Negar Publishing. ISBN  978‑ 600‑ 93542‑ 0‑ 7. Retrieved from https://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/ 1856039 (in Persian)
Salmanmahiny, A. (2018). An introduction to computer‑based spatial planning and assessment. Gorgan, Iran: Vazhgan Sirang Publishing (in Persian)
Sarikhani, Y. et al. (2020). Analyzing the interaction of main components of hidden curriculum in medical education using interpretive structural modeling method, BMC medical education, 20, pp. 1–9.
Valian, H., Abdoli, M. R., & Karimi, S. (2017). Designing an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) of factors influencing auditors’ professional scepticism. Behavioral and Valued Accounting Journal, 2(4), 215–246. DOI: 10.29252/aapc.2.4.215 (in Persian)
Zhou, Q. 2020. Research on the Influencing Factors of Tourist Attractions Selection Based on Ism Method From The Perspective of Intelligent Tourism. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1533 022017. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1533/2/022017
Ziari, K., Arvin, M., Rahimpour, N., & Taghvizirovani, E. (2017). Land suitability assessment for urban development with a spatial planning approach (Case study: Ahvaz County). Geography and Development, 47, 17–36. Retrieved from https://www.magiran.com/paper/1692492/ (in Persian)