تاثیر اقدامات آبخیزداری بر خدمات فرهنگی زیست‌بوم مطالعه موردی: زیرحوضه ده‌چناشک (حوضه آبخیز چهل‌چای- استان گلستان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری گروه آبخیزداری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه آبخیزداری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، ایران

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر پژوهشی جدید در زمینه خدمات زیست‌بوم و به‌طور اختصاصی خدمات فرهنگی زیست‌بوم است. بنابراین، در این پژوهش به ارزیابی اثر اقدامات آبخیزداری (برنامه‌های آموزشی و بیولوژیکی) بر خدمات فرهنگی زیست‌بوم از دیدگاه آبخیزنشینان زیرحوضه ده‌چناشک و کارشناسان پرداخته می‌شود. با توجه به هدف موردنظر، چهار معیار شامل تعامل و ماندگاری جوامع‌محلی، زیبایی و جذب گردشگر در منطقه و آموزش در قالب پرسشنامه در نظر گرفته شد. همچنین تحلیل آماری در نرم‌افزار SPSS صورت پذیرفت. نتایج نشان داد تاثیر اقدامات آبخیزداری بر خدمات فرهنگی زیست‌بوم یکسان نبوده و بیشترین تاثیر به‌ترتیب مربوط به معیار آموزش، زیبایی و جذب گردشگر در منطقه، تعامل و ماندگاری جوامع‌محلی است. به‌عبارتی، هر چند تمامی شاخص‌های مورد بررسی معیارها با اقدامات اجرا شده دارای همبستگی معنی‌داری در سطح 01/0 می‌باشند، اما شاخص امنیت، مهاجرت به داخل روستا و زیبایی از دیدگاه آبخیزنشینان مورد پذیرش قرار نگرفته است. همچنین بر اساس اولویت‌بندی، میانگین شاخص اعتماد به کارشناسان (01/8) بیشتر از شاخص آگاهی دانش ذی‌نفعان (98/7)، رعایت حقوق دیگران (61/7)، بهبود روابط (21/7)، جذب گردشگر (07/7)، زیبایی منطقه (45/6)، استفاده صحیح از منابع (32/6)، مهاجرت به خارج روستا (20/6)، درگیری‌ها و نزاع (37/5)، امنیت جوامع‌محلی (28/5) و مهاجرت به داخل روستا (70/4) است. به‌عبارتی، در میان شاخص‌های مذکور، بیشترین و کمترین تاثیرپذیری به‌ترتیب مربوط به شاخص اعتماد به کارشناسان و مهاجرت به داخل روستا است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Watershed Management Measures on Cultural Services of Ecosystem Case Study: Dehchenashk Sub-Watershed (Chehl Chai Watershed- Golestan province)

نویسندگان [English]

  • zeinab karimi 1
  • Vahedberdi Sheikh 2
  • amir sadoddin 2
1 Former Ph.D Student Dept. of Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
2 Associate Profe. Dept. of Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present study is a new research in the field of ecosystem services and specifically ecosystem cultural services. Therefore, in this study, the effect of watershed management measures (educational and biological programs) on ecosystem cultural services from the stakeholder’s point of views of dehchenashak sub-watershed and experts is discussed. According to the purpose, 4 criteria including: relationship and durability of local communities, landscape aesthetic and tourist attraction and education were considered in the form of a questionnaire. Also, Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS software. The results showed that, the effect of watershed management measures on ecosystem cultural services has not been the same and the greatest effect is related to the criteria of education, landscape aesthetic and tourist attraction, relationship and durability of local communities, respectively. In other words, although all the studied indicators of the criteria have a significant correlation with the implemented measures at the level of 0.01, but the indicators of security, migration into village and aesthetic from the stakeholder’s point of views were not accepted. Also based on prioritization, indicator average the trust to experts (8.01) more than stakeholder knowledge awareness indicator (7.98), respect for the rights of others (7.61), improvement of relations (7.21), tourist attraction (7.07), landscape aesthetic (45.45) 6) correct use of resources (6.32), migration outside village (6.20), conflicts and disputes (5.37), security of local communities (5.28) and migration into village (4.70). In other words, among the mentioned indicators, the highest and lowest impacts are related to the indicator of trust to experts and migration into village, respectively.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Education
  • Watershed management measures
  • Prioritization
  • Questionnaire survey
  • Cultural ecosystem service Dehchenashak Sub-Watershed

مراجع

Agharazi, H. 2017. Biomechanical operation effect on soil carbon of Pakal Basin, Markazi Province. Watershed Engineering and Management, 10 (4), 529-536. (in persian).
Ai, J.; Sun, X.; Feng, L.; Li, Y. & Xiaodong, Zh. 2015. Analyzing the spatial patterns and drivers of ecosystem servise in rapidly urbanizing Taihu Lake Basin of China. Frontiers of Earth Science. 9 (3): 531-545.
Amirnejad, H. 2004. Determining total economic value of the forest ecosystem of northern Iran with emphasis on environmental-ecological valuation and conservation values. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. (in persian).
Baulcomb, C., Fletcher, R., Lewis, A., Akoglu, E., Robinson, L., von Almen, A., Hussain, S. & Glenk, K. 2015. A Pathway to Identifying and Valuing Cultural Ecosystem Services: An Application to Marine Food Webs. Journal of Ecosystem Services. 11: 128-139.
Borland, H.; Ambrosini, V.; Lindgreen, A. & Vanhamme, J. 2016. Building theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management. Journal of Bus Ethics. 135(2): 293-307.
Brown, G.; Montag, J.M. & Lyon, K. 2012. Public participation GIS: A method for identifying ecosystem services. Soc Nat Resour. 25 (7):633-651.
Castro, A.J.; Julian, J.P.; Vaughn, C.C.; Martin-Mikle, C.J. & Quintas-Soriano, C. 2018. Ecosystem Services across US Watersheds: A Meta- Analysis of Studies 2000–2014. Journal of Ecosystem Services and Global Ecology. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76650.
Corvalán, C., Hales, S., McMichael AJ, Butler C, McMichael A, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program), et al. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Health synthesis. Corvalán C, Hales S, McMichael AJ, Sarukhán J, editors. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Dickinson, D.C. & Hobbs, R. J. 2017. Cultural Ecosystem Services: Characteristics, Challenges and Lessons for Urban Green Space Research. Journal of Ecosystem Services. 25: 179-194.
Grunwald. A. 2018. Diverging pathways to overcoming the environmental crisis: A critique of eco-modernism from a technology assessment perspective. Journal of Clean Prod. 197:1854-62.
Hosseini, S.; Amirnejad, H. & Oladi, J. 2016. The evaluating services and functions of the forest ecosystem of Kiasar National Park. Agricultural Economics. 11 (1): 239-211. in persian).
Kabiri Hendi, M.; Mirkarimi, S.H. & Salmanmahiny, A. 2020. Cultural ecosystem services assessment in Golestan Province. Journal of Environmental Sciences Studies. 5 (2), 2560-2568. . (in persian).
Karimi, Z. & Sheikh, V.B. 2019. Evaluation of the attitude stakeholders’ of natural resources and environment projects (Case Study: Hablehroud Watershed). Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 11 (2), 477-467. (in persian).
Lagbas, A.J. 2019. Social valuation of regulating and cultural ecosystem services of Arroceros Forest Park: A man-made forest in the city of Manila, Philippines. Journal of Urban Management. 8 (1): 159-177.
La Rosa, D.; Spyra, M. & Inostroza, L. 2016. Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review. Journal of Ecological Indicators. 61: 89–74.
Leh, M.D.; Matlock, M.D.; Cummingsa, E.C. & Nalley, L.L. 2013. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Journal of Agreculture, ecosystem & environment. 165: 6-18.
Logsdon, R.A. & Chaubey, I. 2013. A quantiative approach to evaluating ecosystem servise. Journal of Ecological Modelling. 257: 57-65.
Luederitz, Ch.; Brink, E.; Gralla, F.; Hermelingmeier, V.; Meyer, M.; Niven, L.; Panzer, L.; Partelow, S.; Rau, A.; Sasaki, R.; Abson, D.A.; Lang, D.J.; Wamsler, Ch. & Wehrden, H. 2015. A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research. Journal of Ecosystem Services. 14, 98-112.
Madadi, A. & Maleki, M. 2016. Assessing the socio-economic effects of natural resource projects implemented from the perspective of stakeholders (Case study: Andabil watershed- Khalkhal city). Journal of Rangeland. 12 (3), 267-280. (in persian).
Marie Muller, S.; Peisker, J.; Bieling, C.; Linnemann, K.; Reidl, K. & Schmieder, K. 2019. The Importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity for Landscape Visitors in the Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb (Germany). Journal of sustainability. 11 (9), 10.3390/su11092650.
Mazur, B. 2010. Cultural Diversity in Organisational the Ory and Practice, Journal of In Tercultural Management, (2), 5–15.
Mengist, W.; Soromessa, T. & Legese, G. 2020. Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps. Journal of Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/.
Meshesha, Y.B. & Birhanu, B.S. 2015. Assessment of the effectiveness of watershed management intervention in Chena Woreda, Kaffa Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 7: 1257-1269.
Meyer, C.; Schomers, S.; Matzdorf, B.; Biedermann, C. & Sattler, C. 2016. Civil society actors at the nexus of the ecosystem services concept and agri- environmental policies. Journal of Land Use Policy.55:352-6.
Millennium Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Milcu, A.I.; Hanspach, J.; Abson, D. & Fischer, J. 2013. Cultural Ecosystem Services: a Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research. Journal of Ecology and Society. 18 (3): 565-598.
Mobarghaee, N. 2010. Multi-indicators analysis, a suitable method to determine the value of ecosystem services in the environmental assessment process. Journal of Environment and Development. 1 (1): 10-1. (in persian).
Moradi Shahgharie. M. & Tahmasebi. P. 2015. Investigation of exclosure effect on carbon sequestration and physical and chemical properties of soil in semi-steppe rangelands of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Journal of Natural Ecosystems Iran. 6 (4), 109-97. (in persian).
Moshari. M.; Sepehri. A.; Barani. H. & Danehkar. A. 2019. Formulating the Criteria and Indexes for Valuation of Cultural Services of Natural Ecosystems on the Basis of Endemic Characteristics of Iran. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 9(4):305-312. (in persian).
Motamed vaziri, B.; Mirzaei, M.A.; Sharifi, F. & Mohebi. A. 2011. The effect of the implementation of watershed management projects on vegetation changes and sustain mass movements. Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS planning Journal. 2, 3. (in persian).
Nadimi, N.; Zahtabian, Gh. & Malekian, A. 2012. Evaluation of the role of watershed management biological measures On flood reduction. (Case study: Yangje Watershed). Watershed Research (Research and Construction). 96, 97-107. (in persian).
Nahuelhaul, L., Carmona, A., Laterra, P., Barrena, J. & Aguayo, M. 2014. A Mapping Approach to Assess in tangible Cultural Ecosystem Services: The Case of Agriculture Heritage in Southern Chilel. 41: 90-101.
Palanisamia., K. & Kumarb, S.D. 2009. Impacts of Watershed Development Programmes: Experiences and Evidences from Tamil Nadu. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research Review. 22: 387-396.
Pleasant, M. M.; Gray, S.A.; Lepczyk, Ch.; Fernandes, A.; Hunter, N. & Ford, D. 2014. Managing Cultural Ecosystem Services. Journal of Ecosystem Services. 8: 141-147.
Rastegar, Sh.; Najafpour, Z.; Jafarian, Z. & Ghorbani, J. 2018. Investigation and Comparison of the Economic Value of Carbon Sequestration Function of Vegetation Cover in biological operations (Case study: Steppic rangelands of Sarbishe, South Khorasan province). Environmental Science, 44 (1): 148-131. (in persian).
Rousta, M.J.; Enayati, K.; Soleimanpour, S.M. & Mesbah, S.H. 2019. The Environmental Value of Stored Carbon in the Soil of Floodwater Spreading Fields of Gareh-Bygon Plain, Fasa, Iran. Watershed Management Research, 32 (1), 31-41. (in persian).
Sadeghi, S.H.R.; Forootan, F. & Sharifi, F. 2004. Watershed Management actions the performance evaluation of qualitative method (case study: Catchment kan). Geographical Research Quarterly. 79, 38-47. (in persian).
Sadoddin, A.; Sheikh, V.; Mostafazadeh, R. & Halili, M.Gh. 2010. Analysis of vegetation-based management scenarios using MCDM in the Ramian watershed, Golestan, Iran. International Journal of Plant Production. 4 (1): 51-62 (in persian).
Shahraki, M.R.; Gholami bagheri, N.; Sharat madandar, M. & Bahmanesh, B. 2015. Pastures products and services, point of views and priorities of local (Case Study: Cashgarized Rangelands, Mazandaran Province, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Sciences, 5: 212-221. (in persian).
Shahrokh, S.; Souri, M.; Moetamedi, J. & Eftekhari, A. 2017. Effects of contour furrow on soil and biomass carbon sequestration (Case study: Khalifan Rangelands, Mahabad). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research. 24 (1), 98-109. (in persian).
Sherrouse, B.C.; Clement, J.M. & Semmens, D.J. 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Geography. 31 (2): 748-760.
Singh, J. & Sharma, T. 2016. Farmers’ Perceptions and Satisfaction Levels on the Performance of Watershed Development Activities in the Morni Hill area of the Siwalik Himalayas in India. 44 (1): 91–104.
Sreedevi, T.; Wani, S.; Sudi, R.; Patel, M.; Jayesh, T.; Singh, S. & Tushar, S. 2006. On-site and off-site impact of watershed development: A case study of Rajasamadhiyala, Gujarat, India. Global Theme on Agro-ecosystems Report no. 20, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, 1-44.
Tabrizi, N.; Zal, M.H. & Jafarpisheh. M. 2020. The role of tourism activities in the development of cultural services of urban ecosystems (Case study: Region 3 of Isfahan). Geographical Urban Planning Research. 8 (1), 115-136. (in persian).
Tahmors, M.; Jafari, M.; Ahmadi, H.; Azarnivand, H. & Nazari Samani, A. 2018. Quantitative evaluation of the effect of watershed management activities on carbon sequestration and storage in climate change reduce (Case study: Parroud watershed - Shahroud watershed tributary). Ecohydrology. 5 (1), 161-172. (in persian).
Van Berkel, D.B. & Verburg, P.H. 2014. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Ecological Indicators. 37: 163-714.
Vaz, A.S. & Santos, H. 2018. Transplanetary, Perspective of Cultural Ecosystem Services Extending Dickinson and Hobbs (2017)’S Definitions, Characteristics nnd Chelleng s of Cultur l Serveces’ Research. Journal of Ecosystem Services. 29: 168-169.
Willcock, S.; Camp, B.J. & Peh, K.S. 2017. A Comparison of Cultural Ecosystem Service Survey Methods Within South England. Journal ofEcosystem Services. 26: 445-450.
 
 
پژوهش های محیط زیست
دوره 12، شماره 24
مجله پژوهشی
اسفند 1400
صفحه 103-115

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار